Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hlynsky v. Osnaburg Local School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1984No. 83-91Published

1Per curiam

The issue presented for consideration is whether the notification and automatic reemployment provisions contained under R.C. 3319.11 are applicable when a teacher’s contract has been suspended in accordance with R.C. 3319.17.

R.C. 3319.17 provides:

“When by reason of decreased enrollment of pupils, return to duty of regular teachers after leaves of absence, or by reason of suspension of schools or territorial changes affecting the district, a board of education decides that it will be necessary to reduce the number of teachers, it may make a reasonable reduction. In making such reduction, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State ex rel. Peake v. Board of Education of the South Point Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dorian v. Euclid Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Voss v. Northwest Local Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bohmann v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API