Legal Opinion

Davis, Agt. v. Oswald Taube

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1925No. 19155PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The defendant in error filed in the municipal court of Cincinnati its bill of particulars against plaintiff in error, James C. Davis, Agent, under Section 206 (a) of the Transportation Act of 1920 (41 Stat. at L. 461; Section 10169g [a], Barnes’ Fed. Code Supp., [U. iSl Comp. St. Ann. Supp., 1923, Section 10071%-ce]), alleging that its cause of action arose out of the possession, use, and operation by the President- of the common carrier, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, and was of such character as prior to federal control could have been brought against the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  5. Haubert v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Slick Airways, Inc. v. ReinertOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API