Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Courtenay

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 15, 1814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. Ujectment on the demise of John Skinner for lot No'. 38, in the city ot MH.tim.orc, described by metes and bounds. Pending the suit Skinner died,, and Hercules Courtenay, and others, bis devíseos, were made parties in his stead.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. Ujectment on the demise of John Skinner for lot No'. 38, in the city ot MH.tim.orc, described by metes and bounds. Pending the suit Skinner died,, and Hercules Courtenay, and others, bis devíseos, were made parties in his stead. The general Issue was pleaded. 1. At the trial the plain fifí' gave in evidence, that Tho~ mas Dorsey, deceased, was in his life-time seized in fee of the premises in the declaration mentioned, and while so seized made a deed of conveyance, regularly executed, acknowledged and recorded, dated the 12th of August 1788, fo Archibald…

1Opinion of the Court

Chase, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court, dissenting from the opinions expressed by the county court in all the bills of exceptions.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sheerer v. GrierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API