Ex Parte Reynolds

April 13, 1904. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The question presented by this appeal is, who is entitled to certain commissions of R. Lee Kerr, receiver, whether the appellant, James E. Reynolds, by virtue of an assignment thereof by the receiver, or respondent, administratrix of A.H. White, deceased, under the law of subrogation. The facts are substantially these:

1. In January, 1899, R. Lee Kerr was appointed receiver of the Rock Hill Cotton Factory Co., in the suit of A.E. Hutchison v. Rock Hill Cotton Factory Co.

2. On December 1, 1899, a bond was executed by the Commercial and…