Legal Opinion

Hagerman Irr. Co. v. East Grand Plains Drainage Dist.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1920No. 2334PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Chaves County; McClure* Judge. Suit by the Hagerman Irrigation Company against the East Grand Plains Drainage District to enjoin a diversion of water. Decree for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT

ROBERTS, J.

The appellee is a drainage ditch organized under the provision of chapter 31, Code 1915. This chapter provides for the organization of such a ditch by the adult owners of land within any district of land, and such drainage ditch, when formed as required by law, is managed by three commissioners appointed by the judge of the district court. Such drainage ditch is made a corporation, and given power to sue and be sued. The appellee herein was organized by the landowners of the East Grand Plains neighborhood in Chaves county for the purpose of draining the lands…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Vanderwork v. HewesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Fairplay Hydraulic Mining. Co. v. WestonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  4. Cardelli v. Comstock Tunnel Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rock Creek Ditch & Flume Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McNaughton v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. United States v. HagaDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API