Legal Opinion

E. R. Sherburne Co. v. Wellenstein, Krause & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 26, 1923No. 1735PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

The motion to dismiss and the plea in abatement for lack of proper service have been heard together. The motion, of course, relates only to the record. The facts which are relied on in support of the plea are contained in an agreed statement.

The E. R. Sherburne Company was, upon an involuntary petition, adjudicated bankrupt. The present defendant was not a party to the petition. After the adjudication, it filed a proof of claim, on which Mr. Withington appeared as its attorney. Pie also appeared for it in several related matters in the bankruptcy proceedings and was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. of Boston v. TibbettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  2. Arkwright Mills v. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbia Foundry Co. v. LochnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API