Legal Opinion

Messinger v. Woodcock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff, Mary Messinger, against the defendant, Ernest Woodcock, on April 28,1936, for a decree declaring that the plaintiff was entitled to the use of all the water “arising from Messinger springs and flowing in Mes- singer creek, down to and” upon the farm land owned by the plaintiff, and that the defendant be forever restrained from interfering in any manner whatever with the free flow of the said water. Later, May 9,193.6, an amended complaint was filed, in which the same relief was asked.

The defendant in his answer prayed that the plaintiff be restrained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrison v. OfficerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Henrici v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Klamath Development Co. v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzstephens v. WATSONOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Beisell Et Ux. v. Wood Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API