Kepl v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The indictment in this case charged a conspiracy to violate certain provisions of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §, 1013814 et seq.). Kepi, one of the defendants, has sued out a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction.
There are but two assignments of error. The first is based upon the ruling of the court admitting certain impeaching testimony, and the second challenges the sufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict. A half-brother of'the plaintiff in error was called as a witness in his behalf. On direct examination the witness…
2Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Safarik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Samuel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.