Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. De Arman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1966No. 8706 PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice.

This matter comes to us from the Superior Court of Gila County on a petition for a writ of certiorari, consolidated by the trial court with a writ of habeas corpus. The Court of Appeals, division two, decided the matter by written decision, In re Guardianship of Rodgers, 2 Ariz.App. 51, 406 P.2d 253, and the case is now before us on a petition for review, A.R.S. § 12-120.24, 17 A.R.S. Rule 47(b), Rules of the Supreme Court.

This case involves litigation between a mother and a father over custody of their eight year old daughter. The Superior Court, after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Andro v. AndroArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Galbraith v. GalbraithArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Cone v. RighettiArizona Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of RodgersArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Borg v. BorgCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Earley v. EarleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API