State v. Whitmore
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
Daniel Whitmore, Jr., was convicted of the crime of rape, under an information charging that the act was committed “by violence and force,” and against the will and consent of his victim; he has appealed from the judgment.
It is first asserted that the information is insufficient in that it does not allege that the girl assaulted resisted and that her resistance was overcome by force and violence.
Rape is defined as “an act of sexual intercourse, accomplished with a female, not the wife of the perpetrator: * * * 1. When the female is under” the age of consent; (2) where she is incapable of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Lancaster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- State v. BancroftNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. MorrisonMontana Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BouldinMontana Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re the Habeas Corpus of ChildersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957