Legal Opinion
Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 17, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, Chancellor:
The opinion previously filed, denying the complainants’ motion to strike out a plea of the statute of limitations, was not based on Chapter 10 of the so-called Chandler amendment, and its provisions need not be considered. While perhaps not clearly stated, the question was whether the old Section 11, sub. d, of Chapter 3 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act of 1898, 11 U.S.C.A. § 29, sub. d, was still a part of that Act on February 1st, 1939, when this suit was brought.
Nor was it then contended that any constitutional question was involved.
The Chandler amendment to 77B of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1944
- Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Hazzard v. AlexanderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. DonahoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Halpern v. BarranCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
- United States Ex Rel. Clark v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973