Legal Opinion

Shewel v. Givan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1830PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.—Assumpsitby Shezoel against Givan. The defendant pleaded, inter alia, non-assumpsit except as to a certain sum, and as to that a tender. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Several pleas, one of which is a tender and refusal of 150 dollars. The following bill of exceptions shows the state of the case before the Circuit Court:—“On the trial of this cause, the plaintiff proved the sale and delivery of a bill of goods at Philadelphia to the defendant, some time in February, 1820, amounting to 347 dollars and 47 cents, on a .credit. It was also proved that the following account, to wit,—Mr. James Givan to Tho. Shewel, Dr. 1820, Feb. 28, To merchandise at 6 mo. $347.37. March 6, ditto, $165.14. Interest up to Jan. 1827,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Obermyer v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
  2. Crawford v. WillingSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Henry v. RiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1788
  4. Delaware Insurance v. DelaunieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1811

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dumey v. SchœfflerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  2. Hubgh v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
  3. Silvers v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API