Legal Opinion

Warner v. Bedell Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 117PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Defendant, the Bedell Company of Pittsburgh, having an unexpired lease on certain premises in that city, agreed, on May 6, 1916, to sublet part of its holding to Truly Warner, plaintiff, for a term beginning August 1, 1916, and ending April 30,1919. By this agreement defendant covenanted that, if an option which it possessed to renew the lease on the entire premises was exercised, the term of plaintiff would be renewed for a like period, subject, however, to the right of defendant, lessor, to cancel the renewed term from and after April 30,1922, “provided......the lessor......shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McHenry v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Boyd v. Merchants & Farmers Peanut Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Swank v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Western Savings Fund Society v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Chanoff v. FialaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Finkle v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re RoswogUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API