Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Herz
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael D. Stallman, J.
Defendants Steven Edward Herz, Carol Perry and IF Management, Inc. move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) and (7) or in the alternative pursuant to CPLR 3212, to dismiss plaintiffs first, fifth, sixth and seventh causes of action of the verified complaint and to bar plaintiff from asserting any defense to IF Management, Inc.’s counterclaim based upon article 11 of the General Business Law. At issue is whether article 11 of the General Business Law affords a private right of action, i.e., whether it impliedly gives individuals capacity to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Uhr v. East Greenbush Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Carrube v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Friedkin v. Harry Walker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Rhodes v. HerzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011