Legal Opinion

Haywood v. Home Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Defendant’s principal assignment of error relates to the judge’s charge. With reference to the first and second issues the court instructed the jury as follows: “I direct you to answer the first issue ‘Yes,’ and the second issue ‘Yes.’ ” The exception to this instruction must be sustained. The defendant’s denial placed the burden on the plaintiff to prove his case by the greater weight of the evidence, and it was error for the trial judge to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff without leaving it to the jury to determine the credibility of the testimony. McIntosh Practice & Pro., 632.

“A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. House v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Globe Yarn Mills, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Evans v. Imperial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Paris v. Carolina Portable Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Hardee v. Charles Worth YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. City of Shelby v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. McCracken v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API