Legal Opinion

In re Becker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 6, 1939No. 4050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting claims 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 15 and 16 of appellant’s application for a patent. Claim 21 was rejected by the examiner but allowed by the board. Eleven other claims were allowed by both tribunals below. Claim 9 is an apparatus claim. The other appealed claims are process claims.

*923Claims 5 and 9 are illustrative of the claims in issue and read as follows:

5. A method of making artificial sausage casings of pasty animal or vegetable fibrous masses comprising…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. General Machinery Corp. v. Clearing Mach. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API