Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1976No. Docket 58313, 58314PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question whether a trial judge has the power to dismiss a case because he disbelieves witnesses. After a guilty verdict against defendants Johnson and Love had been returned by the jury, the judge granted a new trial because he did not believe the testimony of crucial prosecution witnesses. Our earlier order in this case recognizes that a trial judge may grant a new trial because he disbelieves the testimony of witnesses for the prevailing party. A trial judge may grant a new trial when " * * * justice has not been done * * * .” MCLA 770.1; MSA 28.1098. 391 Mich 834;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AbernathyMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. DobineMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. LemmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Elsasser v. American Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. HerbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API