Legal Opinion

Whipple v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1983No. 82-1615PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The jury verdict finding defendant guilty of second-degree murder is supported by competent and substantial evidence, thus it will not be disturbed. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120, 1123 (Fla.1981), affirmed, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Wooten v. State, 361 So.2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

The jury instruction on self-defense, considered in its entirety, was clear, comprehensive, and correct even though it omitted language as to the specific offense the victim was allegedly committing at the time he was killed by defendant. See Sheppard v. State, 322 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Bolin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Sheppard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API