Legal Opinion

James

Massachusetts Land Court

Decided October 15, 1903Published

1Opinion of the Court

In this title there occurs a mortgage given to two persons as executors and trustees under the will of one Monks, an assignment thereof by only one of the executors, and a discharge by the assignee.

In two old Massachusetts decisions a distinction is made, as to the right of one executor to assign a mortgage, between a mortgage taken by the testator and a mortgage taken directly by the executors. In the case of a mortgage made to the testator, one of two executors may make a valid assignment. George v. Baker, 3 Allen at 326, note. Where however a mortgage is made direct to the executors, one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hertell v. BogertNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  2. Smith v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  3. Hertell v.Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  4. Robbins v. HorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API