Legal Opinion

State v. Rosser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1939Published

1Dissent

Since this case was dismissed under a former order of this court, the defendant has filed a petition for rehearing and also a motion to strike his first notice of appeal from the files and to permit him to be heard upon his second appeal.

In our former opinion we held that the appeal must be dismissed because of Rosser's failure to file the transcript within the time allowed by law and that his second appeal, which was taken after the first appeal had been perfected, was invalid.

This ruling Rosser claims was erroneous and contrary to the holding in State v. Tucker, 57 Or. 59, 110 P. 392. In…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. EstesOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cloyes v. EckernOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Grover v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kelley v. PikeOregon Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API