Legal Opinion

Montfort v. Daviss

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1920No. 7606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The purpose of this proceeding is to compel Hon. H. B. Daviss, judge of the Thirteenth judicial district of Texas, to proceed to trial and judgment agreeably to the principles and usages of law in a cause now pending in said district court, and for which purposes this court is requested to issue the writ of mandamus authorized in such cases by article 1595, Vernon’s Say les’ Texas Civil Statutes.

October 6, 1919, in cause No. 10679, W. F. Montfort et al. v. Commissioners’ Court et al., pending in the Thirteenth judicial district, respondent, by order entered upon the petition in said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Hobbs v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. TravisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. McPhail v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Senter v. IshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API