Legal Opinion

Howe v. Muir

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for a per centage under section 308 of the code.

1Opinion of the Court

Gridley, Justice.

This application must be denied, for several reasons.

1. The court, and not the referee, makes the order for the extra allowance, and, of course, the court itself must decide whether “ the prosecution or defence has been unreasonably or unfairly conducted.” In this case no facts are presented to the court, upon which a decision can be based. The referee has assumed to decide that that question; and the court is left to perform only the formal duty of making the order. The referee had no power to pass upon this point. The statute has given it to the court alone.

*2532. It will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Halliday v. McDougallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pinsker v. PinskerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Bent Steel Co. v. Western Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API