Mathew Zaheri Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Bd.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 and Vehicle Code section 3068.
Mathew Zaherí Corporation and Mathew Zaherí (Zaherí) contend the trial court erred in ruling that undisclosed ex parte communication between opposing counsel and administrative law judges did not deprive Zaherí of a fair trial.
We will affirm the judgment, concluding that the trial court properly examined the circumstances for prejudice and did not abuse its discretion in determining that the trial was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spector v. Spector (In re Spector), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Alvarez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Alvarez v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Avedikian v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bornemann v. Gamboa CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.