Legal Opinion

Neff v. Seidman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1923No. Appeal, No. 277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This was a proceeding under the Sheriff’s Interpleader Act of May 26, 1897, P. L. 95. The appeal is from two orders, the first being an order dismissing a rule to show cause why a judgment of non pros should not be opened and the plaintiff permitted to file a statement of claim and bond; the second being an order making absolute a rule to show cause why the sheriff should not sell the property levied upon by virtue of an execution issued against the plaintiff’s property. The defendant secured a .verdict and judgment against the plaintiff’s husband on December 9, 1921.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waring v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Stewart v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Colquhoun v. General Flooring & Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Mullet v. HenselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Rasp v. RaspSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hertzog v. Forry, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1934
  2. Mann v. Schneller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API