Legal Opinion
Baum v. Cato
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1992No. 91-CA-2081PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
599 So.2d 909 (1992)
Neil BAUM, M.D.
v.
Morris CATO.
No. 91-CA-2081.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
May 28, 1992.
Michael R. Connelly, Baton Rouge, for defendant/appellant.
Harold A. Thomas, Katherine B. Muslow, Thomas, Hayes and Beahm, New Orleans, for plaintiff/appellee.
Before BARRY, KLEES and PLOTKIN, JJ.
BARRY, Judge.
Morris Cato's medical malpractice lawsuit was dismissed on an exception of prescription raised by Dr. Neil Baum.[1] Mr. Cato argues that his claim has not prescribed under La. R.S. 9:5628.
On June 22, 1987 Dr. Baum inserted a penile implant into Mr. Cato. Mr. Cato…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chaney v. State Through Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- In Re Medical Review Panel of HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. Willis-Knighton Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Stevenson ex rel. Stevenson v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Carter v. GrantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of GochnourLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997