Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
The proceedings in this case began before the Federal Power Commission, now the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, when Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) filed applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity authorizing interruptible transportation service by Transco to three public utilities. The three utilities, each of which distributes and sells natural gas at retail, are Delmarva Power & Light Company (Delmarva), Pennsylvania Electric Company (PECO), and South Jersey Gas Company (South Jersey). We shall refer to them as “the…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- The Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980