Legal Opinion

Dare v. City of Harrisburg

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided November 5, 1930No. 932Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hargest, P. J.,

This cause comes before us upon bill, answer and testimony.

Statement of pleadings.

The plaintiff, an owner of a property at the southeast corner of Second and Boyd Streets, in the City of Harrisburg, brings this suit against the defendants.

*23The bill avers that there is a full-grown Carolina poplar shade tree thirty-five years of age, healthy and in vigorous condition, beautiful and ornamental, in front of his property. In 1925 the City of Harrisburg, by ordinance, created a Shade Tree Commission. Said commission, at a meeting held about February, 1927, after notice as provided by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Knowles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Wolfe v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Allegheny County Home's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  5. Rosenthal v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API