Legal Opinion

Lee's Administrator v. Smead, Collard & Hughes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 7, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 54 APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT: The facts appear in the opinion of the court. The note should have been presented for payment within the usual banking hours. (Story on Bills of Exchange, see. 328.) The plaintiffs knew, or had reason to believe, that the note in. question was left with Manchester for collection, and that he was not the owner thereof.

Read the full summary

CASE 54 APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT: The facts appear in the opinion of the court. The note should have been presented for payment within the usual banking hours. (Story on Bills of Exchange, see. 328.) The plaintiffs knew, or had reason to believe, that the note in. question was left with Manchester for collection, and that he was not the owner thereof. The plaintiffs are not holders for value in the regular course of business, and their title is subordinate to that of the rightful owner. (5 Johnson's Ch. Rep., 54, 58; 20 Johnson's Rep., 637, 651.) No action can be maintained on the…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE DUVALL

delivered the opinion oe the court:

Harcourt borrowed from Lee $135, for which sum Harcourt executed his note, dated Newport, Kentucky, October 6, 1854, payble thirty days thereafter to M. Seddens, at the “ People’s Bank, Cincinnati.” Seddens, the nominal payee, was, in fact, the mere surety of Harcourt, and as such, indorsed the note to Lee, who also indorsed and deposited it, on the same day it was executed, in the People’s Bank, at Cincinnati, for collection. '

It appears that Manchester, who was the sole proprietor of the People’s Bank, had obtained from Smead, Collard & Hughes,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greenwell v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  2. Alexander & Co. v. Springfield BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. May v. Quimby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
  4. Sanford v. LowenthalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  5. Cox v. KashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API