Pacific Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California Supreme Court
1DissentSchauer, J.
I dissent. I recognize the social desirability of reaching the conclusion declared in the majority opinion insofar as some of the ends to be thereby attained are concerned, but am, regretfully, unable to join the majority of the members of this court in their view of the factual record in such a quantity of its aspects as to make it impossible for me to reach their conclusion. It therefore becomes necessary for me to set out my own impression of a fair and accurate portrayal of the factual record as well as my conclusion of law.
The primary question involved in this proceeding is the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- S. A. Gerrard Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Luckie v. Diamond Coal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.