Legal Opinion

United States v. Banks

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2008No. 06-3593PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*772JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.1

Clarence Frazier Banks, III appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial where he was found guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, Banks argues the following: (1) the district court2 erred by allowing the firearm into evidence because it was seized in violation of the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment; (2) the district court erred in ruling that a pawn shop receipt was admissible non-hearsay and that an ATF purchase form was admissible under the residual hearsay exception; (3) the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Eleuterio Murillo-SalgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Laquann DawnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Thomas ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API