Allen v. Allen

The per curiam affirmance of this case does not reflect the extensive amount of time committed to the case by three judges of this court, much of which would have been eliminated by the trial judge including some basic findings of fact in his final judgment. This is a recurring problem which ultimately may be resolved only by requiring the trial judge to include findings of fact in the judgments.

I reiterate what was said in Owens v. Owens, 500 So.2d 170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987):

We point out, however, that this court’s task of evaluating the final judgment of dissolution has been unnecessarily…