Legal Opinion

People v. Asaro

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeter T. Farrell, J.

The motions now decided, however styled, are treated as applications for orders suppressing the use in evidence — and directing the return — of property, including papers and personal effects seized in the execution of invalid search warrants (Code Crim. Pro., §§ 813-c to 813-e).1 Insofar as they seek suppression of the things seized, the motions are granted. The applications for orders directing return of the property are granted as to the articles set forth in the schedules annexed to the respective short-form orders made and entered herewith. As to the remainder of the property taken under…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. State v. WalcottWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. CrawleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. John CapraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. James Thomas Frazier v. Ralph Roberts, Superintendent of the Cummins Farm Unit of the Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. People v. Gray, New York County Courts1970
  4. People v. Gold, New York County Courts1971
  5. State v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API