Legal Opinion

State v. Camacho

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 12, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HAVEY, P.J.A.D.

A person who has been convicted under N.J.S.A. 2C:39-4a of possession of a firearm with intent to use it against the person of another is subject to the mandatory provisions of the Graves Act. N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6c. In this ease, the trial judge held that it was his function, as opposed to the jury’s, to decide after a Graves Act hearing whether defendant’s intention in possessing the firearm was to use it against the person, as opposed to the property, of another. We disagree, and accordingly reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. State v. HarmonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. State v. StewartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. JenkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. State v. LatimoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CamachoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. State v. MelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. State v. CamachoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API