Legal Opinion

Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 19, 2019No. 18-00134Published

1Opinion of the Court

Court No. 18-00134 Page 2 Agency R., ECF 16-1 (Nov. 28, 2018) (“Pl.’s Br.”). Defendant United States opposes Plaintiff’s motion. Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Mot. for J. on Agency R., ECF No. 21 (Mar. 22, 2019) (“Def.’s Br.”). Commerce’s final scope determination on Lyke’s cupwheels did not adhere to the regulatory framework pursuant to

19 C.F.R. § 351.225. Therefore, the court remands the final scope ruling to Commerce for further consideration in accordance with this opinion and order. BACKGROUND In November 2009, Commerce issued an antidumping order covering diamond sawblades and parts thereof…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Cs Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API