Legal Opinion

E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Dunn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Plaintiff, a corporation, with offices in San Francisco, says that it is the largest hop grower in the world. Defendant Dunn, trading as S. E. Dunn Company, is a hop broker in Detroit. Defendant Seropulos is a dealer in Detroit. Plaintiff’s salesman, Hughes, and Dunn called on Seropulos and on August 24,1920, took his order for 300 bales, 100 pounds each, at 72 cents per pound, Pacific coast hops, 1920 crop, 150 bales to be taken on arrival, sight draft, bill of lading attached, balance within 60 days. The order was subject to confirmation. It was signed for plaintiff, the seller, by Hughes,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Funk v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hannan Real Estate Exchange v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API