Legal Opinion

Chism v. Lamb

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to set aside verdict in ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

The jury found that the plaintiffs 'are the owners of lands abutting upon the shore of Lake George, the lake being public water belonging to the State. The defendant, without consent of the State, and against the protest of the plaintiffs, erected a permanent dock in front of the plaintiffs’ premises in the water fronting their land. It is constructed of timbers, held in place by being weighted with stone, in the ordinary form in which docks are made, and comes in contact with the earth at and below low-water mark and with a wall built by the plaintiffs at low-water mark. The dock is further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Child v. . ChappellNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Rowan v. KelseyNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. City of Brooklyn v. MackayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chism v. LambAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API