Legal Opinion

Nathan H. Gordon Corp. v. Cosman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

This action is brought on a demand note for $20,000 made by defendant to the order of plaintiff on December 31, 1929. Payment has been frequently demanded but nothing has been paid on account of the note, except one payment to plaintiff in partial discharge of interest.

Defendant appeals from the order, and summary judgment thereon, directed in favor of plaintiff under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act, on the ground that there was no defense to the action, that the answer was sham and frivolous and interposed purely for the purpose of delay and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chelsea Exchange Bank v. MunozAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Smith v. Cranleigh, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chester v. ChesterNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Haight v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hennessey v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Walbern Press, Inc. v. Willow & Reed, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lawson v. American Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API