Legal Opinion · Dissent

Douglas v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2009No. S-12857Published

1DissentFabe, Chief Justice

Today the court affirms Ty Douglas's conviction despite the fact that he was barred from attending his own trial and denied the opportunity to testify in person on his own behalf. Although it is certainly true that Douglas had been disruptive in the courtroom in the past, the trial court failed to give him a single opportunity to honor his promise to behave appropriately in front of the jury. Because the law demands that more respect be given to a defendant's right to attend his trial, and in particular to give live testimony if he so chooses, I would reverse Douglas's conviction. |

As the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API