Legal Opinion

State, Office of the Attorney General v. Shapiro & Fishman, LLP

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 2011No. 4D10-4526PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in quashing a civil investigative subpoena duces tecum issued by the Office of the Attorney General and served on appellee Shapiro & Fishman, LLP, a law firm. We find the trial court did not err since the Attorney General’s investigative subpoena, issued exclusively under the statutory authority of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), sections 501.201-.213, Florida Statutes, was issued to investigate actions of the appellee law firm not covered under the rubric of “trade or commerce” as clearly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Armstrong v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Murray v. Mariner HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. Kelly v. Palmer, Reifler, & Associates, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  2. Cornette v. I.C. System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
  3. Williams v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  4. Baker v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. CK Regalia, LLC v. ThorntonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API