Legal Opinion

Theoda E. Mills, Jr. v. City of St. Louis, et al.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided December 3, 2025No. 4:25-cv-01219Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION THEODA E. MILLS, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:25-cv-1219-MTS ) CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Set Aside Default Under Rule 55(c), Doc. [20], has a troubling problem. Multiple times Plaintiff cites to nonexistent cases or purports to provide quotations from real cases that contain no such statement.1 These errors bear the hallmarks of artificial intelligence hallucinations. See Jessica R. Gunder, Why Can’t I Have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Jan Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Gerardo Mariani & Georgina Loureiro v. Doctors Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Harrison v. Union Pacific R. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API