Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Folkerts

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 16, 2005No. 03-1862Published

1DissentCady, J.

I respectfully dissent. Our role in an appeal is to resolve the issues presented in the case based on the facts and the governing jurisprudence. The majority steps out from its well-defined appellate role and, instead, engages in rulemaking. I would decide the case based on the issue presented and affirm the district court.

The district court in this case denied Folkerts’ request to be absent from the deposition of the victim until the lawyers completed all questions pertaining to the description of the assailant. Folkerts objected to her presence at the deposition based on due-process…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Malcus T. Clemons v. United States of America, David E. Clark v. United States of America, Alvin C. Hines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Russell Wayne BenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. State v. HoldernessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API