Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1969No. 40771Published

1DissentNelson, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the conclusions reached in the majority opinion on the issue of employer liability.

It does not appear to be necessary to give a full recital of the facts surrounding the accident and injury here involved. I feel, however, that it is necessary to state that the employee-relator worked as a supervisory employee and produce department manager for Shoppers City, Inc., normally working 10 to 12 hours daily in the supervision of the produce department operations. He had been thus employed for a period of 40 years for various food markets in the St. Paul area.

Respondent…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Oviatt v. Oviatt Dairy, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API