Legal Opinion
In Re Ullman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1955PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
This is the first proceeding involving the immunity statute passed at the last session of the Congress. 1 The United States Attorney has presented to this Court an application for an order directing William Ludwig Ullman to answer before a grand jury questions which he has heretofore refused to answer, upon the assertion of his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The application sets forth that the grand jury was inquiring into matters involving interference with and endangering of the national…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Richard P. Herman, United States of America v. James J. McCann in No. 78-1282Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of America, Alfred M. Watkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. William Ludwig UllmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- In Re the Grand Jury Testimony of KinoyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.