Sekulov v. City of Warren
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
On reconsideration following remand from the Supreme Court, 468 Mich 863 (2003), in light of Adams v Dep’t of Transportation, 253 Mich App 431 (2002), we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendant Macomb County. Because the decision in Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm, 463 Mich 143; 615 NW2d 702 (2000), and, by implication, the decision in Hanson v Mecosta Co Bd of Co Rd Comm’rs, 465 Mich 492; 638 NW2d 396 (2002), must be applied retroactively, plaintiffs claims do not fall within the highway exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1402(1). Our previous affirmance of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Hanson v. Mecosta County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Sekulov v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Adams v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- SEKULOV v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003