Foster v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOYT, Justice.
This is an appeal from convictions on three counts of robbery, each conviction enhanced by two prior felony convictions. The appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of not guilty. The court found him guilty on each count, and the appellant entered a plea of “not true” to the enhancement allegations. The trial court found the enhancement allegations to be true, and assessed punishment at 50 years confinement as to each count, with the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.
In his first ground of error, the appellant contends that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jamail v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- McCambridge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Ngoc Van Le v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.