Legal Opinion
Hainze v. Richards
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2000No. 99-50222PublishedCited by 232 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
Kim Michael Hainze appeals an adverse summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. For the reasons assigned, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
In the early morning hours of November 16, 1997, Alicia Cluck made a 911 call requesting that the police transport her suicidal nephew, Kim Michael Hainze, to a hospital for mental health treatment. Cluck advised that Hainze had a history of depression and currently was under the influence of alcohol and anti-depressants, carrying a knife, and threatening…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gohier v. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by232 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Bush v. StrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Ballard v. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Delano-Pyle v. Victoria County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Richard Vos v. City of Newport BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.