Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grays

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1968No. Appeal, 448PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Although it has been said that no case has an identical twin, the degree of consanguinity between the present case and the problem recently resolved in Commonwealth ex rel. West v. Rundle, 428 Pa. 102, 237 A. 2d 196 (1968), would cast some doubt upon the validity of this maxim. Thus, we are again faced with a challenged guilty plea, a trial record which fails to demonstrate that the plea was entered knowingly and intelligently and testimony by appellant indicating that in fact neither counsel nor the court below explained the possible consequences attendant upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Kerekes v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Kern v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Grays v. Alfred T. Rundle, SuptCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. BrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. AlstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API