Legal Opinion

Kysar v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 4, 1995No. 16373-0-II; 15593-1-IIPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

George A. Lambert appeals a $28,000 judgment in favor of Sam and Joan Kysar. The Kysars cross-appeal an order denying reasonable attorney’s fees. We affirm, except on the issues of terms and attorney’s fees.

The Kysars grow Christmas trees in Clark County, Washington. They sell and ship the trees to distributors nationwide. In transit, the trees require a cool, moist environment, for they can be damaged by temperatures that are too warm or too cold.

Lambert owns the Rainbow Fruit Co. in Boston, Massachusetts. He sells produce throughout the year, and Christmas trees during the Christmas season.

T…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Voicelink Data Services, Inc. v. Datapulse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Smith v. Okanogan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API