Illinois Surety Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; Frank H. Rudkin, judge. Action at law by the United States against the Illinois Surety Company, a corporation. To review- judgment for the United States defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was the surety on a redelivery bond for one Grazi, the condition of which was that Grazi would within six months redeliver to the collector of the port of San Francisco certain theatrical scenery, properties, and apparel which had been imported from France to the United S'tates, and enter the said effects for exportation from the United States within, said six months in the manner prescribed by law and the regulations-of the Treasury Department. Grazi was the proprietor of a theatrical exhibition at San Francisco, and he imported the effects from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Holmes v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Abilene Livestock Auction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937