Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1937No. 34194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

In this case, the juvenile, Paul Clark, was sentenced in the juvenile court for the parish of Orleans for delinquency, for violating Act No. 126 of 1921 (Ex.Sess.), in that he “broke and entered” a house with intent to steal. After due proceeding, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and serve three months in the parish prison. Through his counsel he applied for suspensive appeal which was refused. The judge of the juvenile court offered to grant an appeal in conformity with section 96 of article 7 of the Constitution of 1921. The juvenile through his counsel applied for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Meyer v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. State ex rel. West v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  5. Greencastle Township v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CulottaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. State v. HerbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Bank of New Orleans and Trust Co. v. SeaveySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  5. Bd. of Com'rs. Etc. v. Hunter FoundationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API